‍

Object detection has traditionally relied on complex, multi-stage pipelines involving region proposals, anchor boxes, and post-processing techniques like Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS). However, the introduction of DEtection TRansformer (DETR) by Facebook AI Research in 2020 revolutionized this field. By leveraging the power of transformers—originally designed for natural language processing—DETR simplifies object detection into a streamlined, end-to-end process.

Unlike traditional methods, DETR treats object detection as a direct set prediction problem, eliminating the need for hand-crafted components. This innovative approach allows it to predict object classes and bounding boxes in one pass while capturing global context and relationships between objects. In this blog, we’ll cover the following:

1. Understanding Object Detection & Traditional Approaches
2. What is DETR
3. How DETR Works: Transformer-Based Object Detection
4. Comparison: DETR vs Traditional Object Detectors
5. Advantages and Limitations of DETR
6. Training and Fine-Tuning DETR on Custom Datasets
7. Real-World Applications of DETR
8. Future of Object Detection with Transformers

Understanding Object Detection & Traditional Approaches

Object detection is a core computer vision technique that enables computers to identify and locate objects within images or videos. Unlike simple image recognition, which assigns a single label to an entire image, object detection goes further by classifying individual objects and pinpointing their positions using bounding boxes. For example, in an image with two cats and a dog, object detection not only labels "cat" and "dog" but also specifies where each is located within the scene.

‍

This technology combines two key tasks: object localization, which identifies the position of objects, and object classification, which determines their category. By integrating these tasks, object detection provides a detailed understanding of visual data, making it essential for applications like autonomous driving, medical imaging, retail automation, and video surveillance.

Modern object detection methods often rely on deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to achieve high accuracy and real-time performance. Popular models like YOLO (You Only Look Once) and Faster R-CNN have set benchmarks in this field by enabling precise detection across diverse scenarios. Let us dive into some of these classical models to understand the field.

Faster R-CNN

R-CNN (Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network) was one of the pioneering models for object detection, introducing a region-based approach combined with deep learning. It begins by generating region proposals using methods like Selective Search, which identifies potential areas in an image that might contain objects. These proposals are resized to a fixed size and passed through a pre-trained CNN (e.g., AlexNet) to extract high-dimensional feature vectors. The extracted features are then classified using Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for object recognition, while bounding box regression refines the localization of detected objects. Finally, Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) is applied to eliminate overlapping boxes, keeping only the most confident detections. Although accurate, R-CNN is computationally expensive due to its need for thousands of CNN forward passes per image, making it impractical for real-time applications.

‍

Faster R-CNN, introduced in 2015, addressed the inefficiencies of R-CNN by replacing Selective Search with a learnable Region Proposal Network (RPN). The RPN generates region proposals directly from feature maps produced by the backbone CNN, significantly reducing computational overhead while maintaining accuracy. These proposals are refined through ROI Pooling and passed to classification and bounding box regression layers to produce final detections.

‍

‍

By integrating proposals and detection into one network, Faster R-CNN reduced training complexity and improved efficiency. Its two-stage design—first proposing regions, then refining them—balances speed and precision.

YOLO (You Only Look Once)

YOLO (You Only Look Once) is an object detection model that processes an entire image in a single pass through its neural network, making it exceptionally fast and efficient. YOLO treats object detection as a regression problem, predicting bounding boxes and class probabilities simultaneously.

‍

Unlike traditional models like Faster R-CNN, which rely on multi-stage pipelines for region proposals and classification, YOLO uses a unified architecture to detect multiple objects in real time. This approach enables YOLO to achieve high-speed inference, making it ideal for applications such as autonomous vehicles, video surveillance, and robotics.

‍

‍

YOLO’s single-pass architecture makes it faster and simpler to implement compared to Faster R-CNN's multi-stage design. While Faster R-CNN excels in precision-critical tasks, YOLO’s speed advantage makes it the preferred choice for real-time applications where quick decision-making is essential.

SSD

SSD (Single Shot MultiBox Detector) is a single-stage object detection model that balances speed and accuracy, making it a strong competitor to models like YOLO and Faster R-CNN. SSD processes an input image in a single pass through its network, leveraging feature maps at multiple resolutions to detect objects of varying sizes. It uses default boxes (anchor boxes) at each feature map location, predicting both class probabilities and bounding box offsets simultaneously. This multi-scale approach allows SSD to handle objects of different sizes better than YOLO, particularly for larger objects, while maintaining real-time performance.

Compared to YOLO, SSD offers higher accuracy, especially for detecting small and overlapping objects, as it uses fixed-size anchor boxes and considers the Intersection over Union (IoU) metric to refine predictions. However, SSD is slightly slower than YOLO due to its more complex architecture and multi-scale feature extraction. While YOLO excels in speed (making it ideal for real-time applications), SSD provides a better trade-off between precision and speed, making it suitable for scenarios where accuracy is critical but real-time performance is still needed.

‍

‍

SSD strikes a middle ground between the speed of YOLO and the precision of Faster R-CNN. It is ideal for applications where both accuracy and efficiency are important but does not require the extreme speed of YOLO or the high computational cost of Faster R-CNN.

Challenges with traditional detectors

Traditional object detection models like Faster R-CNN, YOLO, and SSD have been instrumental in advancing the field, but they each come with notable challenges that limit their performance in certain scenarios.

‍

‍

Faster R-CNN, a two-stage detector, excels in accuracy but suffers from computational inefficiency. Its reliance on a Region Proposal Network (RPN) for generating object proposals adds complexity and slows down inference, making it unsuitable for real-time applications. Additionally, the use of anchor boxes requires careful tuning of hyperparameters like aspect ratios and scales, which can be labor-intensive. Faster R-CNN also struggles with detecting small or heavily occluded objects due to its fixed feature extraction process.

YOLO is designed for speed, making it ideal for real-time applications. However, this speed comes at the cost of accuracy. YOLO often struggles with small objects and crowded scenes where multiple objects overlap. Its grid-based prediction system limits its ability to localize objects precisely, leading to errors in bounding box placement, especially for objects with unusual aspect ratios or those far from the camera. While newer versions have improved performance, YOLO still faces challenges in handling scale variations and complex backgrounds.

SSD strikes a balance between speed and accuracy but has its own limitations. It struggles to detect small objects effectively due to its reliance on lower-resolution feature maps at deeper layers of the network. Like YOLO, SSD’s use of default boxes requires careful tuning to match the dataset's characteristics. Additionally, its performance can degrade when detecting objects at long distances or under challenging conditions like cluttered scenes.

What is DETR?

DEtection TRansformer (DETR) redefined object detection by introducing a transformer-based architecture that eliminates traditional hand-crafted components while achieving state-of-the-art results.

• Transformer-based architecture: DETR uses a transformer encoder-decoder architecture combined with a CNN backbone to process images end-to-end. The encoder extracts spatial features, while the decoder leverages learnable object queries and self-attention mechanisms to predict object classes and bounding boxes. This approach enables DETR to capture global relationships between objects, improving detection in complex scenes.

‍

• No need for anchors or proposal mechanisms: Unlike traditional models, DETR eliminates the need for anchor boxes and region proposal networks. Instead, it uses object queries to directly predict bounding boxes and classes. This removes the dependency on hand-crafted components and avoids post-processing steps like Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), simplifying the detection pipeline.

‍

• End-to-end set prediction: DETR frames object detection as a direct set prediction problem. Using bipartite matching during training, it ensures unique predictions for each ground-truth object without redundancy. This end-to-end approach reduces reliance on heuristics and optimizes all predictions simultaneously.

‍

• Joint detection and segmentation: DETR seamlessly extends to panoptic segmentation by adding a mask prediction head. It unifies instance segmentation and semantic segmentation tasks within the same framework, enabling pixel-level classification alongside object detection without additional complexity.

‍

• Competitive performance: Despite its simplicity, DETR achieves accuracy comparable to traditional models like Faster R-CNN while being easier to scale. Its ability to handle crowded scenes and occlusions effectively demonstrates its versatility across diverse datasets.

‍

How DETR Works: Transformer-Based Object Detection

DETR revolutionized object detection by integrating a transformer architecture with a convolutional backbone. Below is a breakdown of its workflow:

CNN Backbone

DETR begins by passing the input image through a pre-trained CNN backbone (e.g., ResNet-50) to extract hierarchical feature maps.

• The CNN compresses the image into a lower-resolution feature map e.g., (batch_size, 256, height/32, width/32).
• These features retain spatial information about objects, which is crucial for downstream tasks

Transformer Encoder

The encoder refines the pretrained CNN's features using self-attention to capture global relationships between pixels.

• Positional encodings are added to the flattened feature map to preserve spatial context.
• Multi-head self-attention layers process these features, enabling the model to understand interactions between distant objects (e.g., occlusions or crowded scenes)

Transformer Decoder

The decoder uses learnable object queries to detect objects through cross-attention with the encoder’s output.

• Each query (fixed in number, e.g., 100) interacts with the encoded features to predict a unique object.
• The decoder layers refine these queries iteratively, focusing on different regions of the image to resolve ambiguities.

Prediction Heads

Final predictions are generated via lightweight feed-forward networks (FFNs):

• Classification head: Predicts object classes (including a "no-object" class for empty queries).
• Bounding box head: Regresses box coordinates (center, width, height) using sigmoid activation for normalization.

Set-Based Loss and Bipartite Matching (Training)

DETR’s training hinges on a Hungarian loss that matches predictions to ground-truth objects:

• Bipartite matching: The Hungarian algorithm pairs each prediction with a ground-truth box to minimize a cost function combining classification error and bounding box mismatch.
• Loss components:
  
  • Classification loss: Cross-entropy for matched pairs.
  • Bounding box loss: L1 distance and generalized IoU for localization accuracy.
• This eliminates the need for post-processing steps like Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS)

Summary

1. Image → CNN features + positions: The backbone extracts features, enriched with positional encodings.
2. Transformer encoder: Captures global context through self-attention.
3. Transformer decoder with queries: Generates object embeddings via cross-attention.
4. Output set of boxes + labels: Prediction heads produce final detections in parallel.

By unifying feature extraction, global reasoning, and set prediction into a single framework, DETR achieves end-to-end object detection without hand-crafted components like anchors or NMS. Its simplicity and performance mark a paradigm shift in computer vision.

Comparison: DETR vs Traditional Object Detectors

DETR sets itself apart from traditional object detectors like Faster R-CNN, YOLO, and SSD by introducing a transformer-based architecture that simplifies the detection pipeline while maintaining competitive performance. Unlike Faster R-CNN, which relies on multi-stage processes involving region proposals and hand-crafted anchor boxes, DETR eliminates these components entirely. It uses object queries and self-attention mechanisms to directly predict bounding boxes and class labels in parallel, streamlining the workflow into an end-to-end system. This approach also removes the need for post-processing steps like Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), which are integral to models like YOLO and SSD.

In terms of performance, DETR matches the accuracy of Faster R-CNN on benchmarks like COCO while offering better scalability and interpretability. Its ability to capture global context through self-attention makes it particularly effective in handling crowded scenes and overlapping objects—areas where YOLO and SSD often struggle. Although DETR initially faced criticism for slower inference speeds compared to YOLO’s real-time capabilities, advancements like RT-DETR have bridged this gap, delivering faster processing without compromising accuracy. By simplifying the architecture and leveraging transformers, DETR represents a paradigm shift in object detection, paving the way for more unified and efficient vision models.

Below is a comparison across several dimensions:

‍

‍

Advantages and Limitations of DETR

Advantages of DETR:

• End-to-End Trainability: Simplifies the pipeline by eliminating region proposals, anchor boxes, and post-processing steps like Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS), enabling seamless end-to-end training.
• Parallel Predictions: Uses object queries to predict all objects simultaneously, improving efficiency and handling complex scenes with multiple overlapping objects.
• Global Context Understanding: The transformer's self-attention mechanism captures relationships between objects across the entire image, enhancing detection accuracy in crowded or occluded scenarios.
• Versatility: Easily extends to tasks like panoptic segmentation without significant architectural changes.
• Competitive Performance: Matches or surpasses traditional models like Faster R-CNN in accuracy while offering a simpler architecture.

Limitations of DETR:

• High Computational Cost: Training and inference require significant computational resources due to the transformer’s complexity, especially for high-resolution images.
• Slow Convergence: DETR requires more training epochs compared to traditional detectors, making it less efficient during the training phase.
• Fixed Object Query Count: Predetermined object queries can limit performance in scenes with a highly variable number of objects, potentially leading to missed detections or inefficiencies.
• Small Object Detection: Struggles with detecting small objects due to its reliance on high-level features and lack of multi-scale feature maps in its native design.

To address the limitations in DETR, newer versions such as Deformable DETR (2021) or RT-DETR (2024) have been proposed in the literature.

Training and Fine-Tuning DETR on Custom Datasets

Setup and Pre-trained Model

Start with a pre-trained DETR model, e.g., facebook/detr-resnet-50, PekingU/rtdetr_r50vd_coco_o365, etc. Use libraries like Hugging Face’s transformers to load the model and processor. Ensure GPU support for faster training.

from transformers import AutoModelForObjectDetection, AutoImageProcessor  

model = AutoModelForObjectDetection.from_pretrained(CHECKPOINT)

processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained(CHECKPOINT)

Prepare Your Dataset

Format your dataset in COCO or Pascal VOC style. Preprocess images to match the pre-trained model’s normalization (mean/std values) and resizing requirements. Split into train/validation/test sets.

Adjust the Model for New Classes

Modify the classification head to match your dataset’s class count. Update id2label and label2id mappings to reflect new classes. Ensure the model’s final layer matches the new output dimensions.

model.config.id2label = {0: "cat", 1: "dog"}

model.config.label2id = {"cat": 0, "dog": 1}

‍

Fine-Tuning Process

Use Trainer from Hugging Face for streamlined training. Configure TrainingArguments with epochs, batch size, and learning rate (e.g., 5e-5). Include warm-up steps to stabilize training.

training_args = TrainingArguments(

    output_dir="results",
    
    num_train_epochs=20,
    
    per_device_train_batch_size=8,
    
    learning_rate=5e-5,
    
    warmup_steps=300,
    
)

‍

Hyperparameter Tuning

Tune the hyperparameters of the DETR model to obtain optimal performance for your specific project. For example:

• Learning Rate: Start with 1e-4 to 5e-5 for stability.
• Batch Size: Adjust based on GPU memory (e.g., 8-16).
• Epochs: DETR requires longer training (50-100 epochs) for convergence.

Note: Smaller datasets may need fewer epochs to avoid overfitting.

Evaluation and Iteration

Evaluate using COCO metrics (mAP, mAP50, mAP75). Monitor loss curves for stability. If performance plateaus, try:

• Increasing dataset size (≥1k samples recommended).
• Adjusting augmentations (e.g., multi-scale training).
• Extending training duration.

Leverage DETR’s flexibility

• Multi-Scale Training: Randomly resize inputs to improve scale robustness.
• End-to-End Refinement: Unlike YOLO/Faster R-CNN, DETR skips anchor tuning and NMS.
• Panoptic Segmentation: Add a mask head for joint detection and segmentation.

By following these steps, DETR adapts seamlessly to custom tasks, combining transformer efficiency with competitive accuracy.

Real-World Applications of DETR

Below are some of the most popular real-world applications of DETR.

• Autonomous Vehicles: DETR plays a crucial role in autonomous driving by accurately detecting objects like pedestrians, vehicles, and traffic signs in real-time. Its global self-attention mechanism helps handle challenges such as occlusions, lighting variations, and complex backgrounds. By leveraging DETR’s ability to model global context, autonomous vehicles can make safer navigation decisions and improve path planning under diverse environmental conditions.

For example, this 2024 paper enhances DETR's applicability to autonomous driving by addressing key challenges in LiDAR-based panoptic segmentation. Traditional DETR models use fixed, randomly initialized queries, which struggle with sparse LiDAR data and geometrically similar objects in driving scenes. 

The authors introduce Clustered Feature Aggregation (CFA), which dynamically generates queries by clustering point features into instance embeddings, allowing adaptive query representation tailored to each scene. Additionally, Shifted Point Clustering (SPC) refines clustering accuracy by shifting points toward predicted instance centroids, improving segmentation precision for small or distant objects. These innovations enable DETR to better capture spatial relationships and handle sparse, irregular LiDAR point clouds.

‍

By optimizing query generation and leveraging positional context, the method enhances autonomous vehicles' perception capabilities, critical for tasks like object detection, scene understanding, and 4D tracking in dynamic environments.

• Surveillance and Security: In surveillance systems, DETR enhances real-time monitoring by detecting intruders, abandoned objects, or suspicious activities with high precision. Its end-to-end design simplifies tracking in crowded scenes and dynamic environments, making it ideal for critical infrastructure protection and public safety applications.
  
  
• Video Analytics and Object Tracking: DETR’s ability to detect objects accurately across video frames allows it to excel in video analytics and object tracking. It is used in applications like traffic monitoring, crowd management, and anomaly detection, where its global attention mechanism ensures robust performance even in cluttered or overlapping scenarios.

For example, QDETRv extends DETR for video analytics and object tracking by introducing a temporal-aware transformer architecture tailored for one-shot detection in videos. It replaces DETR’s static object queries with recurrent object queries that propagate temporal context across frames, enabling the model to track objects dynamically. The authors integrate a cross-attention mechanism between query image features and video frame features, allowing the model to leverage spatio-temporal relationships and detect unseen objects specified by a single query image.

‍

Additionally, they propose unsupervised video pretraining using synthetic trajectories and a reconstruction loss to improve feature alignment, addressing the challenge of limited labeled video data. By combining these innovations, QDETRv achieves state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating DETR’s adaptability to video tasks while preserving its end-to-end, anchor-free design.

• Retail and Inventory Management: In retail environments, DETR streamlines inventory management by automating object detection for stock counting and shelf monitoring. Its real-time capabilities reduce manual labor and improve operational efficiency, enabling businesses to maintain accurate inventory records and optimize supply chains.
  
  
• Medical Imaging: DETR has shown promise in medical imaging tasks like tumor detection and segmentation. Its ability to detect objects of varying sizes without anchor boxes makes it particularly effective for identifying small lesions in CT or MRI scans. This enhances diagnostic accuracy and supports personalized treatment planning. For example, this 2023 paper evaluates the efficacy of 3 variations of the DETR model in medical object detection.
  
  
• Satellite and Aerial Image Analysis: DETR is well-suited for analyzing satellite and UAV imagery by detecting objects like buildings, vehicles, or environmental hazards. Its multi-scale feature extraction capability ensures accurate detection of small or occluded objects in aerial images, aiding applications like urban planning, disaster response, and environmental monitoring.
  
  
• Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR): DETR enhances AR/VR experiences by enabling real-time object detection for interactive environments. In AR applications, it can identify objects in the physical world for overlaying digital information, while in VR it supports immersive simulations by detecting virtual objects with high accuracy.

V-DETR adapts DETR for virtual reality (VR) applications by focusing on 3D object detection in point clouds, a critical task for immersive VR environments. It introduces a novel 3D Vertex Relative Position Encoding (3DV-RPE) mechanism, which enhances DETR’s cross-attention by encoding the relative positions of 3D points to the vertices of predicted bounding boxes. This approach aligns with the principle of locality, ensuring attention is focused on relevant regions near objects while ignoring irrelevant areas. 

Additionally, the authors propose an object-normalized box parameterization to handle variations in object orientation and size, making the model robust to complex spatial arrangements in VR scenes. These improvements significantly boost performance on benchmarks like ScanNetV2 and SUN RGB-D, achieving state-of-the-art results with better efficiency and reduced training epochs. By enabling accurate 3D object detection, V-DETR enhances VR applications requiring precise spatial understanding, such as interactive object manipulation and scene reconstruction.

‍

Future of Object Detection with Transformers

Transformers are redefining object detection, moving beyond traditional CNN-based approaches to enable end-to-end learning, unified architectures, and real-time efficiency. Here’s how transformers are shaping the field’s future:

• Transformer-Based Detector Ecosystem: The transformer-based detector ecosystem has expanded rapidly since DETR’s debut. Models like Deformable DETR (multi-scale attention for small objects) and RT-DETR (real-time optimization) now cater to diverse needs, from high-precision medical imaging to edge computing. Hybrid architectures, such as ViDT (Swin Transformer backbone), and V-DETR (3D detection with vertex encoding), demonstrate the flexibility of transformers across tasks.
  
  
• Real-Time Transformers and YOLO vs DETR Convergence: Real-time transformer models like RT-DETR and RF-DETR now rival YOLO’s speed while surpassing its accuracy. For instance, RT-DETR-R50 achieves 53.1% AP at 108 FPS, outperforming YOLOv8-L (52.9% AP at 71 FPS). YOLO itself is integrating transformer components (e.g., YOLO-S), while DETR variants eliminate post-processing steps like NMS, reducing latency. This convergence is blurring traditional speed-accuracy trade-offs, with transformers increasingly dominating benchmarks.

‍

• Beyond Bounding Boxes– Unified Tasks: Transformers unify tasks like detection, segmentation, and tracking. DETR’s extension to panoptic segmentation and V-DETR’s 3D detection (56.2% AP on ScanNetV2) exemplify this trend. Models like Olympus (Microsoft) leverage multimodal transformers for multi-task vision systems, enabling applications from autonomous driving to augmented reality without task-specific architectures.
  
  
• Improved Training Techniques: Advances like query denoising, one-to-many matching, and self-supervised pretraining (e.g., DINOv2) have slashed DETR’s training time by 50% while boosting accuracy. Techniques such as IoU-aware query selection (RT-DETR) and bipartite matching ensure precise localization, achieving up to 66.0% AP50 on challenging datasets.
  
  
• Integration with Vision Transformers (ViT) and CNN Hybrids: Hybrid designs merge ViTs’ global context with CNNs’ efficiency. RT-DETR uses a CNN backbone and transformer encoder for real-time processing, while ViDT combines Swin Transformers with lightweight decoders. Edge-optimized models like LR-DETR (22.8% fewer FLOPs than RT-DETR) highlight the shift toward deployable transformers.
  
  
• Open-Source and Industrial Adoption: Open-source tools (DETR, detrex, RF-DETR) and datasets (COCO, Objects365) accelerate adoption. Industries leverage transformers for:
  
  • Autonomous vehicles: V-DETR’s LiDAR panoptic segmentation (63.4% PQ).
  • Healthcare: DETR-based tumor detection in medical imaging.
  • Retail: Real-time inventory management with RT-DETR. Baidu’s RT-DETR and Microsoft’s Olympus framework underscore corporate investment, while startups deploy edge-ready models on IoT devices

Transformers are poised to dominate object detection, driven by their versatility, scalability, and performance. Key trends include edge AI deployment, self-supervised learning, and unified multimodal systems. As the ecosystem evolves, transformers will likely render hand-crafted components obsolete, ushering in an era where detection, segmentation, and 3D understanding converge seamlessly.

Conclusion

As object detection continues to evolve, DETR and its transformer-based successors have paved the way for a new era of vision models that are simpler, more unified, and highly adaptable. By eliminating traditional hand-crafted components like anchors and Non-Maximum Suppression, DETR has demonstrated the potential of end-to-end learning in object detection. Its extensions, such as Deformable DETR and RT-DETR, have addressed initial limitations like slow convergence and computational inefficiency, making these models viable for real-world applications ranging from autonomous vehicles to medical imaging and augmented reality.

The future of object detection lies in leveraging transformers' ability to unify tasks like detection, segmentation, and tracking while integrating innovations such as hybrid CNN-transformer backbones and improved training techniques. 

As open-source tools and industrial adoption grow, transformers will inherently dominate the field, bridging the gap between research and practical deployment. DETR’s impact is not just a milestone but a foundation for the next generation of vision systems, where simplicity meets scalability, and performance meets versatility.

See Lightly Train in Action

If you're part of a busy machine learning team, you already know the importance of efficient tools. Lightly understands your workflow challenges and offers three specialized products designed exactly for your needs:

• LightlyOne: The comprehensive data curation platform, built to automatically select and manage high-value images, reducing labeling costs and increasing dataset quality.
• LightlyTrain: Empower your models with smarter training workflows using advanced embedding and clustering techniques to ensure robust model performance.
• LightlyEdge: Take advantage of powerful on-device inference and smart data filtering directly at the edge, optimizing your computer vision applications for speed and efficiency.

Want to see Lightly's tools in action? Check out this short video overview to learn how Lightly can elevate your ML pipeline.

‍